In a case brought to light by the International Human Rights Clinic at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Supreme Court of Honduras in February overturned the convictions of six environmental activists that drew the ire of the international community.
In 2018, eight environmental activists in Guapinol were arrested after setting up a camp to protest an iron ore mining project in Carlos Escaleras National Park that threatened the village’s water supply. The mining company’s allied security forces instigated violence against the protesters, yet prosecutors charged the protesters themselves with an assortment of crimes, including alleged acts of violence.
“The innocent defendants spent more than two years in pretrial detention while the prosecutor had no proof of their culpability for the crimes of which they were accused,” said Professor Camilo Sánchez, the clinic’s director.
In September 2020, the clinic published a report detailing the factual background of the case and provided a legal analysis of the situation, the history of violence and harassment of human rights defenders in Honduras. At the time, this was the first report by an international organization on the case, according to Sánchez, and the report brought the issue to the attention of other international organizations and governments.
Camilo Sánchez is the director of the International Human Rights Clinic in the School of Law. (Photo by Sanjay Suchak, University Communications)
Members of Congress cited the clinic’s report in a letter asking the U.S. State Department to pressure Honduras to protect human rights and the defenders. Subsequently, the United Nations and Amnesty International confirmed information in the clinic’s report.
The Honduran Supreme Court’s Constitutional Chamber unanimously sided with the defendants and threw out their case on Feb. 10, the day after six protesters were convicted. Two had been acquitted.
“The defenders were tried, for example, by a court with jurisdiction over serious crimes, explicitly created in Honduras to combat organized crime gangs,” Sánchez said. “The court found that this violated defendants’ right to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent, and impartial tribunal established by law. Consequently, the case must go back to the beginning of proceedings for a competent judge to remedy these procedural violations.”
For the past three years, the clinic has partnered with the American Bar Association Center for Human Rights, especially the center’s section in charge of trial monitoring. For example, through another ABA referral, the clinic produced research aimed at protecting gay men from being persecuted in Nigeria.

